⚠️ PRE-REFINED-PROMPT-archived 2026-05-01T20:45 BST per Full Phase-2-3 Reversion — this memory file records a lock that has been DISCARDED. The Q is queued for re-ask under refined-prompt v3.0 discipline. Original lock content preserved below for forensic continuity. Do not act on this memory’s recommendations as if locked. Audit-record:
~/testatetech/docs-strategy/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-29-multi-phase-audit/audit-records/2026-05-01-full-phase-2-3-re-ask-under-refined-prompt.mdv1.0. Refined-prompt v3.0 reference:~/testatetech/docs-strategy/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-29-multi-phase-audit/refined-end-of-turn-directive.md.
ζ-Q3 Asset Taxonomy LOCKED ε with 9 i-ζ classes (sub-option A) — 2026-04-30T20:15 BST
Decision
ε CCO/BFO-rooted hybrid asset taxonomy locked under G+ permanent (per ζ-Q2 A-127). 9 i-ζ classes preserved (per A-10 / Shape X i-ζ 2026-04-23) but rooted in BFO 2020 Continuant taxonomy for ISO 21838-2:2021 compliance + CCO compatibility + DoD/IC baseline alignment (Jan 2024).
Why: Wave-4 research lifted all 9 classes to HIGH BFO-rooting confidence (was MIXED with 3 LOW/MODERATE). Smith Building Ontologies with BFO (Arp/Smith/Spear 2015 MIT Press) ingested at Tier-1; Donohue 2017 + IAO + FIBO + LADM ISO 19152 resolved Receivable + BusinessAsset + AgriculturalProperty. ε execution cost dropped to ~£5-8K + 2-3 days authoring (was £8-15K + 3-5 days); rework risk dropped 10% → 5%. Convergent decision pattern matches ζ-Q1 (Option C criteria frame).
How to apply: All Phase-3 module-authoring uses the 9 BFO-rooted i-ε classes. Donohue 2017 directive-information-entity GDC framework reusable for all deontic entities (Power-of-Attorney rights / Trust beneficiary entitlements / Will provisions / Capacity attestations / Liability / Bequest / SubstitutionClause). PensionAsset stays deferred to Year-2+ per richard-tasks #190 trigger conditions (HMRC IHT409 separate-treatment; competitor pressure from Thomson Reuters CoCounsel “fiduciary-grade AI”; UK pension reforms; partner-firm usage data >20%).
9 BFO 2020 Continuant rootings
| # | Class | BFO 2020 root | Confidence (post-wave-4) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FinancialAsset | GenericallyDependentContinuant | HIGH |
| 2 | RealPropertyAsset | MaterialEntity → Object | HIGH |
| 3 | AgriculturalPropertyAsset | MaterialEntity → Object/ObjectAggregate | HIGH (was MODERATE; resolved via LADM ISO 19152 + Smith Ch 5) |
| 4 | VehicleAsset | MaterialEntity → Object | HIGH |
| 5 | BusinessAsset | GenericallyDependentContinuant (refs cmns-org:FormalOrganization in v2 stack via vi-6) | HIGH (was LOW; resolved via FIBO + Donohue 2017) |
| 6 | ChattelAsset | MaterialEntity → Object | HIGH |
| 7 | DigitalAsset | GenericallyDependentContinuant | HIGH |
| 8 | IntellectualPropertyAsset | GenericallyDependentContinuant | HIGH |
| 9 | Receivable | GenericallyDependentContinuant (directive information entity per Donohue 2017+IAO) | HIGH (was LOW; resolved via Donohue) |
Scoring
6 options against locked 14-criterion C frame: ε 3.95 / α confirm-i-ζ 3.59 / γ broad-12-class 3.49 / β minimal-5-class 3.10 / ζ TT-product-derived 3.06 / δ FIBO-wholesale 3.04. ε wins 7/8 sensitivity perturbations + 0.36 margin to α (above 0.20 threshold). Perturbation #6 (commercial-pragmatism flip) favoured α by 0.40 margin.
Sub-Q (10/11/8/7) options: A stay-9 4.27 / B 10+Pension 4.27 / D 8 merge Agri 4.24 / E 7 merge Agri+Vehicle 4.09 / C 11+Pension+Insurance 4.05. A and B tied; Rich locked A.
Cascade artefacts
- arch-state Tier-1 v3.12 → v3.13 + A-128 amendment
- INDEX v2.3 → v2.4
- 2026-04-18 architecture-options scorecard v2.1 → v2.2 status note
- richard-tasks-tt #190 (Year-2+ PensionAsset promotion trigger conditions)
- ζ-Q3 cascade file at
2026-04-29-multi-phase-audit/answered-questions/Q-003-zeta-shape-x-angle-i-asset-taxonomy.mdv1.0 - Smith book ingested at
~/off-github/library/indexed/arp-building-ontologies-bfo/Tier-1 (PDF + EPUB + extracted-text + TOC + metadata.md + notes.md 9 ULID quotes + exclusion-log.md; Ch 5 Continuants + Ch 8 BFO-at-Work depth-read)
Methodology unlock
Donohue 2017 directive-information-entity GDC framework applies to ALL deontic entities in v2, not just Receivable. This resolves a Phase 3 module-authoring methodology question across Wills + Trusts + Delegation + Capacity + Probate that was implicitly open. Carry-forward to ζ-Q4+ and Phase 3.
Honest caveats
- Convergent decision (Rich + Claude both arrived at ε after wave-4 evidence; matches ζ-Q1 pattern).
- Two LOW-confidence classes (BusinessAsset + Receivable) resolved via Donohue 2017 + IAO + FIBO. AgriculturalPropertyAsset was MODERATE; resolved via LADM ISO 19152 + Smith Ch 5.
- AgriculturalPropertyAsset stays separate top-level class (not merged with RealProperty per option D). UK practitioner usage (BPR/APR; HMRC IHT414) justifies explicit modelling.
- PensionAsset deferred Year-2+ — not “no”; trigger-gated.
- Smith book purchase ~£35-45 + 30-min ingest + 90-min targeted-deep reading; decisively right per T82 cost-benefit.