⚠️ PRE-REFINED-PROMPT-archived 2026-05-01T20:45 BST per Full Phase-2-3 Reversion — this memory file records a lock that has been DISCARDED. The Q is queued for re-ask under refined-prompt v3.0 discipline. Original lock content preserved below for forensic continuity. Do not act on this memory’s recommendations as if locked. Audit-record:
~/testatetech/docs-strategy/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-29-multi-phase-audit/audit-records/2026-05-01-full-phase-2-3-re-ask-under-refined-prompt.mdv1.0. Refined-prompt v3.0 reference:~/testatetech/docs-strategy/docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-29-multi-phase-audit/refined-end-of-turn-directive.md.
ζ-Q6 R2-reframed T-box layering LOCKED φ.α’ α 3-layer status quo — 2026-05-01T03:57 BST
Decision
φ.α’ α 3-layer status quo (single PROV-O upper EL; OWL 2 EL middle per module; SROIQ application) locked under ω.α + ψ.γ’ + ε + G+ permanent. FIRST ζ.2 decision authored AFTER MQ-001 R2 reversal — validates the reversal-recovery pattern as load-bearing.
Why: Under R2 (single PROV-O upper, no multi-parent, no Prudhomme bridge), φ.γ’s T-box fragmentation justification (multi-parent reasoner-tax management) DISSOLVED. viii-3 multi-profile output achievable at OUTPUT level via single-source authoring + ROBOT derivation — same output, simpler authoring, ~£3-5K + 2-3 days saved. Recommendation FLIPPED ω.γ-context φ.γ → R2-context φ.α’.
How to apply: All Phase-3 module-authoring uses single-source per module + ROBOT OUTPUT-level multi-profile derivation. ε grounding work transfers cleanly to SSSOM TSV alignment-metadata rows. A-21 20 gates (no new gates). No new richard-tasks.
Configuration
| Element | Value |
|---|---|
| Layer 1 upper | PROV-O only (W3C Rec 2013) at OWL 2 EL where possible; BFO peer SPARINGLY tier per A-22 |
| Layer 2 middle | OWL 2 EL per module — single-source authoring per module; SSSOM TSV alignment metadata for ε grounding |
| Layer 3 application | SROIQ + Catala+Mopsa+Lean integration |
| viii-3 multi-profile | OUTPUT-level ROBOT (robot reduce + robot extract + robot reason) → ~30 OWL artefacts at OUTPUT (not at T-box authoring) |
| A-21 CI gates | 20 (no new gates; existing G-OWL-PROFILE-REGRESSION covers OUTPUT-level multi-profile validation) |
| richard-tasks | NONE NEW (#196 from MQ-001 covers Phase-2+ ω.γ uplift trigger including reversibility scope) |
Scoring (R2-reframed)
5 options against locked 14-criterion C frame: φ.α’ α 3-layer status quo 4.55 / φ.γ’ γ 3-layer + multi-profile T-box 4.45 / φ.ζ’ Phase-1 EL + Phase-2+ uplift 4.31 / φ.ε’ ε 5-layer profile-fragment 3.55 / φ.δ’ δ 2-layer collapse 3.36. φ.α’ wins 6/8 sensitivity perturbations. Margin to φ.γ’ = 0.10 (below 0.20 threshold but pattern reflects genuine option-closeness rather than architectural over-stretch — under R2 architecture is meaningfully simpler).
Cascade artefacts
- arch-state Tier-1 v3.16 → v3.17 + A-132 amendment + Shape X §3 angle (v) row update
- INDEX v2.7 → v2.8
- 2026-04-18 architecture-options scorecard v2.5 → v2.6 status note
- ζ-Q6 cascade file moved current-questions/ → answered-questions/ + status: ready-to-ask → answered + maturity: ready-to-ask-r2 → locked
Methodological observations
- FIRST ζ.2 decision after a reversal validates the reversal-recovery pattern. Reversals are recoverable when prior locks are scoped (ε grounding work transferred cleanly to alignment metadata; ψ.γ commitments largely preserved as ψ.γ’).
- Recommendation FLIP ω.γ-context φ.γ → R2-context φ.α’ demonstrates that fresh re-derivation under changed architectural context yields material new analysis.
- Convergent decision pattern continues: 6 of 7 ζ.2-related decisions convergent (ζ-Q1 + ζ-Q3 + ζ-Q4 + ζ-Q5 + MQ-001 + ζ-Q6 R2-reframed; only ζ-Q2 G+ permanent was Rich-divergent).
- viii-3 alignment via OUTPUT-level ROBOT: φ.α’ satisfies viii-3 lock by deriving outputs from single-source authoring (FIBO + Mondo + uPheno production-grade pattern). T-box-level multi-profile fragmentation not required.
- Margin compression cluster (3 below-threshold) preceded reversal; post-reversal margin still below threshold but reflects option-closeness not over-stretch. Going forward: distinguish margin compression from over-stretch via per-decision honest analysis.
Honest caveats
- Phase-1.5 reasoner-tax validation richard-tasks #193 retired under MQ-001 R2 — no multi-parent regime; reasoner pass times return to baseline ~22s DL (vs ~32s under ω.γ).
- Phase-2+ uplift to T-box-level multi-profile (φ.γ’ or φ.ε’) remains optionality if Phase-2+ evidence justifies — covered by richard-tasks #196 trigger conditions.
- 5-year TCO under φ.α’ ~£12K vs φ.γ’
£28K (£16K savings).